The platform / GRCorb
SAK Technology · 3 · Prove itGRCorb — governance, risk and compliance in one orb
Compliance programs fail in the gap between knowing a control is required and knowing how to build it. Most GRC tools will tell you that control A.8.9 is failing. GRCorb tells you how to make it pass, then collects the evidence that it stayed passing.
- 01
Scope
Pick your frameworks and entities; obligations load from the library.
- 02
Govern
Branded policy packs generated from your scope in minutes.
- 03
Assess
Control assessment with 5×5 registers and FAIR quantification.
- 04
Evidence
Collected from your cloud environments, not chased over email.
- 05
Audit
Your assessor works inside the platform, not in a shared drive.
- 06
Remediate
Owners, dates and build instructions per failing control.
- 07
Report
Board packs and regulator reports from the same evidence.
Most platforms tell you the control failed.
GRCorb tells you how to build it.
AI Policy Builder
Branded policy packs generated in minutes from your scope, your entity details and the framework you're certifying against.
52 frameworks · 3,895 obligationsRisk & quantification
5×5 registers for the board, FAIR modelling for the finance director. Same risks, two languages.
ISO 31000 · FAIRContinuous control monitoring
Controls verified straight from your own stack through 30 connectors, so evidence accumulates instead of being gathered.
30 connectors · 10 categoriesGRCorb Engineering
Build instructions per control — the part most GRC tools leave to you.
How to build each controlAudit workspace
Plan, test and certify with your assessor working inside the platform rather than in an email thread.
ISO · SOC 2 · PCI DSSAwareness & phishing
Simulation campaigns and training records that land in the same evidence store as everything else.
Evidence for NCA ECCEvidence for Essential EightWhat changed this month
GRCorb is moving fast. Here is what shipped most recently.
Connector marketplace
30 named sources across identity, cloud, endpoint, code, security tooling and more. Connect one with its own read-only key and GRCorb collects automatically. Jira and ServiceNow work both ways: a finding raised as a ticket closes back when the ticket is done.
30 connectors · 10 categoriesExecutive view
A board page with risk posture, compliance, critical risks, control effectiveness, audit readiness and open remediations, plus a residual and inherent risk heat map and a 90-day trend. Print it or save it as a PDF for the board.
Board-readyDepartment validators
On government standards such as DGA Qiyas and NDMO, evidence waits for the owning department’s validator to approve it. Each department sees its own score and its own standards.
Maker-checker approvalRisks suggested from scoping
Your scoping answers produce a starting risk register. Each suggestion shows the answer it came from, with a first score to review before you add it. Any control gap can raise a risk in one click.
Scoping → risk registerAI evidence review
AI screens each attachment the way a reviewer would on a first pass: does it match the control, is it current, what is missing. It advises and your people approve. AI is off until you switch it on.
Advises, never approvesA new look, in English and Arabic
GRCorb now wears the SAK T.E.C theme: sharper corners, one clear action colour, and status shown in words as well as colour. Arabic keeps full right-to-left layout.
AR + EN30 connectors, ten categories, one evidence store
Each connector uses its own read-only key. What it collects is timestamped, hash-sealed and attached to the controls that need it.
Try GRCorb on your own framework
Pick a framework, load your scope, and watch the policy pack generate. GRCorb runs on its own platform at grcorb.com — trials and live demos start there.
Start on grcorb.com ↗Or book a walkthrough with us and we'll run it against your environment
Which frameworks GRCorb maps
The obligation library, what each framework asks for, and the evidence an assessor wants to see.
See the frameworks → The other halfThreat Landscape Monitoring
Evidence is stronger when it starts from what an attacker can actually reach. Both products share one asset graph.
See Threat Landscape Monitoring →